First Previous - Page 1 of 1 - Next Last

Level 3 Computerised Mock Exam - Webfinity and Beyond - Query when checked Examiners' Answer

  • Member PM.Dip
  • Practice Licence
  • 30 posts
  • # 81414

Hi everyone,

I was just wondering whether someone attempted the above Mock Paper, and wondered the following in regards to the calculation of the Partners' Current Account - Appropriation of the Profit.

According to the answers on the Mock Exam, the Examiner took the Salary payable to new Partner - Gehan before allocating the Profits to the partners at different Profit Sharing Ratios, making (in my opinion) the figure that is shared wrong.

The Examiner took the Profit £19496 and then immediately after deducting the Interest on Capital for the different 2 periods and the Gehan Salary (£916 x 6 months, i.e. £5496), meaning that the profits to be shared amongst the partners did not fully take into account the actual period that the new partner joined the partnership.  Hopefully the calculations and differences between my calculations and the examiners' one make far more sense than trying to explain this in text:

Examiners' calculations:

Webfinity and Beyond Appropriation Account

 

 

For 2011/12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Profit

19496

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Interest on Capital Apr - Sep

 

 

 

 

Karl Shephard

250

 

 

 

Rosalina Thomas

375

 

 

 

 

 

 

-625

 

 

 

 

 

18871

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Interest on Capital Oct - Mar

 

 

 

 

Karl Shephard

295

 

 

 

Rosalina Thomas

420

 

 

 

Gehan Noel

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

-775

 

 

 

 

 

18096

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less Salary for Gehan Noel:

 

 

 

 

 

6 Months x £916:

 

-5496

 

 

 

 

 

12600

 

Profit for sharing Apr - Sep

 

 

 

 

 

Karl Shephard (1/2)

3150

 

 

 

Rosalina Thomas (1/2)

3150

 

 

 

 

 

 

6300

 

Profit for sharing Oct - Mar

 

 

 

 

 

Karl Shephard (2/5)

2520

 

 

 

Rosalina Thomas (2/5)

2520

 

 

 

Gehan Noel (1/5)

1260

 

 

 

 

 

 

6300

 

 

 

 

 

12600

 


As you can see the above Profit £12600 was split evenly between the two periods, whereas Gehan Salary only relates to the 2nd Period, meaning that the actual Profit Sharing for April to September should be higher than the one relating to October to March.

Below are my calculations:

Appropriation Account              
   Karl  Ratio  Rosaline  Ratio  Gehan  Ratio  Total 
Net Profit whole Year                19,496.00
The Net Profit is to be split into              
A - the first 6 months                  9,748.00
B - the last 6 months                  9,748.00
               
1st 6 months - Profit to be Allocated                  9,748.00
               
Salary                 -                     -                     -                       -  
               
Interest on Capital
5% per annum (2.5% for 6 months)
      250.00         375.00                   -     -       625.00
               
Profit Allocation    4,561.50 1    4,561.50 1                 -          9,123.00
               
Last 6 months - Profit to be Allocated                9,748.00
               
Salary                 -                     -        5,496.00   -   5,496.00
               
Interest on Capital
5% per annum (2.5% for 6 months)
      295.00         420.00          60.00    -       775.00
               
Profit Allocation    1,390.80 2    1,390.80 2       695.40 1      3,477.00
               
Total Allocation Year    6,497.30      6,747.30      6,251.40      19,496.00
               
Summary Year  Karl     Rosaline     Gehan     Total 
Salary                 -                     -        5,496.00        5,496.00
Interest on Capital       545.00         795.00        60.00         1,400.00
Profit Allocation    5,952.30      5,952.30         695.40      12,600.00
Total    6,497.30      6,747.30      6,251.40      19,496.00


   Karl     Rosaline     Gehan     Total 
Examiners' calculation    6,215.00      6,465.00      6,816.00      19,496.00
My Calculation    6,497.30      6,747.30      6,251.40      19,496.00
Difference Between Examiners & Mine -     282.30   -     282.30         564.60                     -  


Did someone thought in a similar way to mine, or can explain me why I should follow the examiner's answer instead?

Finally I can see that in some of the Mock exams the Chart of Accounts (COA) is actually changed by the Examiners Suggestive answers, whereas sometimes it is not.  What is the principle set on this?

What about the Partners' Capital and Current Accounts showed on the Balance sheet?  Are those to be meant to be changed by the candidate too?  As most of you, who use Sage Accounts, noticed that the COA is mainly designed to Limited businesses, so are we meant to change that one too, so it goes more in line with the Sole Traders or Partnership's format.

Your input and expertise would be very much appreciated.

Garmen

  • Member PM.Dip
  • Practice Licence
  • Accredited Training Provider
  • 33 posts
  • # 81833

Hi Carla

Comment from examiner:

With regard to profit sharing the examination paper only includes an extract of the partnership agreement and so candidates must complete the finer points of their answer using convention in the absence of specific instructions. As the period being reported is a year, this period takes precedence when appropriating profits with assumptions on fractions of this period falling lower down the appropriation. In this way the candidate should make appropriations from the yearly profit figure first.

In the case of Webfinity we know that there was a change in capital after 6 months, the amounts of capital held by each partner and the rates of interest paid; so the figures can be calculated exactly without any assumptions being made. We also know Gehan Noel's salary is £916 per month and that he was present for 6 months, so his salary of £5,496 is deducted from the year's profit along with the interest payments before the profit share itself is split into 2 x 6 month periods. In general, all appropriations of the net profit including, where stated, interest paid on capital and interest charged on drawings as well as salary payments should be made before the profit sharing takes place as these are costs that have occurred during the year's trading.

A general note on examination technique may be relevant here: If an examiner sees an incorrect figure on its own, they are unable to award any marks for it. However if the same incorrect figure is shown alongside an explanation of how that figure has been derived, then they are usually able to award some marks for the method. In the computerised part of this paper full marks may be awarded for the correct profit share figures on their own (as no workings have been requested) however if incorrect figures are given no marks can be awarded. Whereas, if some evidence (e.g. an appropriation account or even just an audit trail) is provided that shows how the incorrect profit share has been derived and it can be seen that, for example, the 12 months salary of £10,992 was deducted, an incorrect interest rate was paid on capital or an incorrect net profit figure was derived due to some other error, then it is likely that the candidate will still be awarded some of the marks allocated for this question.

The marks allocated to the questions within the Level 3 computerised papers would not cause a candidate to fail if this appropriation / profit share was incorrect on its own. Only if several other errors have been made as well would a candidate be likely to fail the paper.

I hope this helps

Allison 
ICB 


Edited at 12 Apr 2012 02:33 PM GMT

First Previous - Page 1 of 1 - Next Last
bottomBanner
loading