First Previous - Page 1 of 1 - Next Last

New London venue and meeting date

  • 145 posts
  • # 89252

We have a new venue for our London meetings.  It is the Doggett's Coat and Batch by Blackfriars Bridge.  It takes about five minutes to walk to from Blackfriars Station.  You exit the station, cross the road, cross the bridge and it's at the end of the bridge.

Our next meeting will be Wednesday 27th March and we'll meet at 6.30pm to start at 7pm.

Barbara Wilson from HMRC will be our speaker.  Some of her may have seen her at Conference.

http://www.nicholsonspubs.co.uk/doggettscoatandbadgesouthbanklondon/ 

  • 145 posts
  • # 89720

Wow! London branch had a GREAT meeting last night! New venue, places sold out,13 new attendees and a great talk from HMRC's Barbara Wilson. The meeting had a real buzz about it!

Hope you all enjoyed it as much as I did!  Laughing

  • 145 posts
  • # 89740

Ami @ ICBsaid:

“Great news, but is there any photographic evidence?  The Avon branch sent in a picture of their meeting with Barbara, did you see the newsletter article?  http://www.bookkeepers.org.uk/News/1855

Now a sighting of Barbara Wilson AND a branch banner at the same time would really be something....”


I put a photo on the Facebook page this morning. The branch banner was left at the St Stephen's Club for storage. Mathini was going to try and arrange collection.

  • Member PM.Dip
  • Practice Licence
  • 30 posts
  • # 89778

Dear All

Many thanks for the RTI meeting held on the 28th March 2013.  Shame that went so quickly and there was no time to ask more questions.

I was hoping that by the end of the meeting I would be completely confused free with this RTI, but unfortunately, the more I became aware of the different things, the more confused I got.

I will try to separate my questions so hopefully someone will be able to provide me some guidance. 

FPS

My first comment is about FPS. When we are talking about the FPS are we actually talking about individual FPS or group FPS?  With this I mean, and putting in the same line of scenario I described in the meeting.  I run both a weekly and monthly payroll.  The First FPS would be before I process the 1st payroll.  Does this mean that I need to send 2 first FPS, as I run both weekly and monthly payroll? Or does this mean that I will be sending First FPS for every staff I will be processing payroll, 20 First FPS as I have got 12 Monthly Paid staff and 8 Weekly Paid staff?

When I have a new joiner in the middle of the year then I need to send another first FPS, isn't it?  And the same applies with leavers, that I send the Final FPS?

If the above is correct then I believe I understand what these terminologies actually mean.

FPS and pay dates

An intensive discussion was carried out about Pay Dates and Submission dates and the more I think about what is required, the more confused I get.

As explained I run the software Moneysoft to process the payroll.  This is a RTI Ready Software recommended by HMRC, so I assume that all the information HMRC requires is handled by Moneysoft.  Unfortunately I was not able to speak to Moneysoft customer service about the different things that were mentioned in the meeting such as ticking the Irregular payments box, as the software does not seem to have this.  Furthermore I seem to recall that I read that in order for HMRC to know about this Irregular payments, then I would need to select “Other” in the working hours range, but I was told in the meeting that the working hours “Other” and Irregular payments are two complete distinct things.

I also recall that for the directors we could choose annually paid, but again I cannot see anything on the software that allows this.  The options I have got are Weekly paid, Fortnightly, 4-Weekly and Monthly.

Finally in regards to this and the cash advances I am slightly confused about the reporting to HMRC.

In the bar scenario I gave currently my client pays bar staff some cash advances before the end of the month, when payroll is processed.  Staff gets paid cash upon request and this could vary between £0 to £1000.00 or more.  These cash advances do not correlate to the hours worked and all of the cash advances they get are then deducted as subs to the net pay.  The gross pay is calculated based on the hours worked for that month, and then the income tax and NIC are calculated on a monthly basis and then deducted with constitutes their net pay.  After that the cash advances are deducted to the net pay, so they are paid only the difference.

I was told that every cash advance needs to be submitted to HMRC via the FPS.  My question now relates to how can the person dealing with the payroll submit the information to HMRC?  So if the person gets 25 cash advances in a month, then 25 FPS need to be sent to HMRC?  I mean how can this be possible?  I was told that I can process the payroll on a daily basis.  I have never seen a payroll practice processing daily payroll and I have done a payroll course and I have never heard of such a thing.  Even the HMRC manual payroll tables are weekly and monthly, not daily…, so I am not sure how can this be possible.  

Furthermore how can this information can be sent to HMRC via FPS?  On my payroll package and described above I have Weekly paid, Fortnightly, 4-Weekly and Monthly payroll, so how can I report to HMRC that I have paid £20 to Mr A today (net), £50 tomorrow, £5 on the next day? I have clicked on my payroll package to do a test on the FPS and the information that is sent is the Weekly payroll information, so where can I put the £20 above???

I do not want to be a pain.  I think it was just time to implement RTI, so the HMRC records are more up-to-date and people’s earnings are assessed more promptly but if the above is a must, then this is just a “joke” in my opinion.

This means that in this occasion the payroller has 7 days to report the PAYE information, meaning that in this scenario monthly payroll needs to be processed weekly instead.  This will cause a massive burden (admin and financial) to SME and companies that provide cash advances, as instead of processing a monthly payroll they will need to process a weekly payroll., so their payroll costs will increase by almost 4 times!

Directors Pay

Finally I have got a question in regards to the directors and NIC threshold.

Some Accountants put the Directors salaries up to the Personal Allowance Threshold, so they do not pay any tax, but if the code is 944L, then the Directors and employer will end up paying NIC.  What is more tax efficient way:

-       pay up to the Personal Allowance Threshold (no payment of Income Tax)

-       pay up to the NIC Threshold (no payment of Er and EE NIC)

when the director is also paid dividends?

PS1 : I would welcome those that attended the RTI with the software companies to comment on the above (whether Sage, Quickbooks can handle Daily, Annual, etc payroll).

PS2: Can someone talk about TOMS on the next meeting and or Gifts to staff and clients? 

Many thanks

Carla 



Edited at 31 Mar 2013 01:44 AM GMT

  • 145 posts
  • # 89820

Hi Carla.

I have passed your questions on to Barbara from HMRC.  I'll update you when I hear back from her. 

  • Member PM.Dip
  • Practice Licence
  • 30 posts
  • # 90080

Mad Lizsaid:

“Hi Carla.

I have passed your questions on to Barbara from HMRC.  I'll update you when I hear back from her. ”

Hi Liz

Do you know when Barbara is likely to reply to my question?  I know she might be busy, but I think it would be handy to have an answer quite soon, as the RTI reporting just started, and it would be nice to know what to do from day one.  Has she responded to any other questions that you forwarded to her?

From experience the last technical posts I submitted were never responded to such as TOMS (not by you, by the way), so I am just worried that this might also be the case?  Hope not...

By the way I have contacted Moneysoft and they told me the following:

- The software does not process payroll period other than Weekly, Fortnightly, 4-Week and Monthly.  So the annual ones are excluded.
- The software does not "need" to have the irregular payments ticked.  This is done automatically by the system The guy said the software sends HMRC information about new starters and leavers, so the assumption is that if the employee has not left, then it is still working for the CO.  Something was mentioned about the 3 months, but the guy kept saying that the software handles it...
- The software cannot process daily FPS, which in the bar scenario (paying employees £20 today, £5 tomorrow, etc) would be a problem.  My question in regards to this is, if the software cannot handle this and yet this is compulsory, how come HMRC recommends the software?  Surely that should not be the case!!!!  I am going to try to call Quickbooks tomorrow, so as Sage, and see if they have got this (just for my own knowledge).

Thanks in advance.
Carla



  • 145 posts
  • # 90089

She hasn't replied yet.

  • Member PM.Dip
  • Practice Licence
  • 30 posts
  • # 90791

Mad Lizsaid:

“She hasn't replied yet.”



Liz, have you got any news in regards to the questions I have asked Barbara Wilson?

I think it would be handy to receive a response soon, as the questions were sent nearly 1.5 months ago.


Thanks
Carla   

  • 145 posts
  • # 90804

Garmensaid:

Mad Lizsaid:
“She hasn't replied yet.”



Liz, have you got any news in regards to the questions I have asked Barbara Wilson?

I think it would be handy to receive a response soon, as the questions were sent nearly 1.5 months ago.


Thanks
Carla   ”


I can't force her to reply, Carla.  In any case, she is not an RTI specialist so you may be contacting HMRC's RTI people.

  • Member PM.Dip
  • Practice Licence
  • 30 posts
  • # 90979

Mad Lizsaid:

Garmensaid:
Mad Lizsaid:
“She hasn't replied yet.”



Liz, have you got any news in regards to the questions I have asked Barbara Wilson?

I think it would be handy to receive a response soon, as the questions were sent nearly 1.5 months ago.


Thanks
Carla   ”


I can't force her to reply, Carla.  In any case, she is not an RTI specialist so you may be contacting HMRC's RTI people.”

I know you can't force her.... I am just quite "annoyed" because once again I have spent the time putting the above together for nothing...

If she did not plan to reply to questions, why offering to do so in the first place?

Anyway....

 

First Previous - Page 1 of 1 - Next Last
bottomBanner
loading