|
Thankyou Carmen for opening this discussion.
This has been swimming in back of brain for long time. I also note your comment that it might be easier to implement in a larger practices where it might be easier to absorb losses against gains. I have often wondered if this is the case.
C:
Two clients with quite similar business profiles can be largely different in terms of the time required to complete their work. As you mention, there are so many variables. Some may be easier - like how many bank accounts/credit cards (and think if there's a lot of action on directors loans, should be treated as bank accounts for pricing) these could incur an extra fee per account.
In my mind, one of the biggest challenges is how organised the client is. Can they be relied on to provide all material in a timely manner? The same fixed fee package for an organised client could return a nice margin. On the other hand that same fixed package for a similar business profile where you have to chase for everything, stop-start the job etc could lead to lots of unbillable hours. How then do you advertise a fixed fee for packaged services but justify a different fee for some that require extra time? Or do you spend lots of time (your admin time) billing for variations?
I'm dealing with builders about getting a house built. They have a "Continguency fee" if job cant start on time Has crossed my mind that would be a nice one to apply to bookkeeping. Provide a checklist of what to be provided, date to be provided by and if not done add the "Contingency Fee"?
I have a few existing could easily put on fixed fee. They have been predictable over a long period; same thing each month/quarter and possibly more importantly they want as little as possible input. I control the workflow and can use whatever at my disposal to get through those jobs.
Brings me to another challenge from the online world - where the client shares some of the bookkeeping. I have a tough time trying to convince some - the less they do the less I could charge. Some cases I charge differently. For future looking at implementing significantly different rates for these kinds of jobs.
Looking forward to others taking up this discussion.
|